Title & Purpose
Blow ye the trumpet in Zion, and sound an alarm in my holy mountain: let all the inhabitants of the land tremble:
for the day of the LORD cometh, for it is nigh at hand, Joel 2:1.
All quotations from the Scriptures will be from the Authorised Version - the best and most accurate English translation of the Scriptures.
Please see sermons down the left hand column of the Blog about why the Authorised Version is the best and most accurate English translation of the Scriptures
and why we reject the many perversions of the Scriptures, including those so beloved of many neo-evangelicals at present such as ESV & NKJV.
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
Is an abortion ever right?
This begs the question is it ever right to grant an abortion to someone in these circumstances? The answer is yes! There are certain circumstances where it is wholly justified. This is justified on the grounds that an unborn child does not have the right to kill its mother. The unborn child must abide by the moral law of God like everyone else, which says that: Thou shalt not kill. The unborn child like anyone else does not have an absolute right to live, even to the point where its mother loses her life as a result. An unborn child does not have an innate right to kill its parent.
If nothing is done in these extreme circumstances, where a mother's life is in danger, then both the mother and the child will die. The sixth commandment not only forbids us to take life, it also requires us to preserve life. The answer to Shorter Catechism question 68 states: The sixth commandment requireth all lawful endeavours to preserve our own life and the life of others.
To stand back and let both mother and child die on the grounds that abortion is always wrong is not in keeping with the teaching of the Scriptures and is actually to break the sixth commandment and kill by omission.
Historic Protestantism has always held to the belief that in these cases, where it is impossible to save the life of both mother and child, then it is the mother’s life which should have the first right to be protected. To argue otherwise is to give an unborn child the right to kill its parent.
It has to be stressed that these types of cases are extremely rare but they do exist. Another example of would be where a mother is suffering from a terminal disease. Where a mother may need medical treatment or surgery to preserve her own life but that treatment would harm and kill her unborn child she is entitled to go ahead with that treatment. That would be her personal choice.
This is the sole exception to the rule that the unborn child has the right to life and is not to be killed for some personal, social or economic reason. It is in the case where a mother’s own life is at stake!